<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Semantic Does Not Mean Irrelevant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clintjohnsonwrites.com/semantic-does-not-mean-irrelevant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clintjohnsonwrites.com/semantic-does-not-mean-irrelevant/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:54:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ForeverTeal</title>
		<link>http://clintjohnsonwrites.com/semantic-does-not-mean-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-1355</link>
		<dc:creator>ForeverTeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clintjohnsonwrites.com/?p=1411#comment-1355</guid>
		<description>Men can&#039;t see chartreuse?  Rats, I wrote a story about a 10 year old boy who perceives a woman&#039;s name in a ugly combination of colors including chartreuse.  Was that C.I. (color-ifically incorrect)?  In my opinion, chartreuse should be legendary - it&#039;s so hideous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Men can&#8217;t see chartreuse?  Rats, I wrote a story about a 10 year old boy who perceives a woman&#8217;s name in a ugly combination of colors including chartreuse.  Was that C.I. (color-ifically incorrect)?  In my opinion, chartreuse should be legendary &#8211; it&#8217;s so hideous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://clintjohnsonwrites.com/semantic-does-not-mean-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-1354</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clintjohnsonwrites.com/?p=1411#comment-1354</guid>
		<description>Hilarious, perhaps; certainly true.  That is one of those words that men are genetically predisposed not to speak in nearly any context.  You should see what happens when we break the rule.  We start singing soprano, become physiologically capable of flouncing, and can visually recognize the particular shade that is chartreuse (which I maintain is a legend)---very disconcerting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilarious, perhaps; certainly true.  That is one of those words that men are genetically predisposed not to speak in nearly any context.  You should see what happens when we break the rule.  We start singing soprano, become physiologically capable of flouncing, and can visually recognize the particular shade that is chartreuse (which I maintain is a legend)&#8212;very disconcerting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L.T. Elliot</title>
		<link>http://clintjohnsonwrites.com/semantic-does-not-mean-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-1353</link>
		<dc:creator>L.T. Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clintjohnsonwrites.com/?p=1411#comment-1353</guid>
		<description>Okay, the puppy thing was pretty frickin&#039; hilarious. And if I might say, your issues with semantics rather endears me to you--as you know from my love of your vocabulary--and so no offense will be taken from me if you should ever ask that. =]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, the puppy thing was pretty frickin&#8217; hilarious. And if I might say, your issues with semantics rather endears me to you&#8211;as you know from my love of your vocabulary&#8211;and so no offense will be taken from me if you should ever ask that. =]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
