I forgot to mention that I did an interview with The Enchanted Inkpot (not an actual enchanted inkpot) which was posted on their blog Tuesday. You can still read it by clicking here, if you’re interested. It’s largely about conflict in story and how I applied my theories on conflict rich narrative in GDC.
And a final reminder that the Fire Petal Books auction will only be accepting bids on most items and services until tomorrow. If you haven’t yet looked at what’s available, go here.
Lastly, I just added a paper I wrote a few years ago about archetypal literary theory to the essay section of the site. (That section is available to members only, so you’ll need to join for free to see it.) This is more academic than the other essays I’ve posted so far, with citation of sources used included. Anyone interested in a more theoretical treatment of my storytelling philosophy may be interested. As always, comments are welcome, and complaints are accepted.
A week late, true, but here it is. My presentation to the Utah Educational Library Media Association last Friday went as well as I could have hoped. It’s always a bit nerve wracking to deliver a new presentation, and this was the first time I’d ever given this program on archetype and abandoning canon to develop narrative literacy in elementary schools. The session was pretty well attended and participation was excellent. We talked about parallels between Goosebumps and Great Expectations, then I broke attendees into groups to find archetypes in a variety of texts, and then I used that to jump into the theory. The attendees seemed very pleased with the experience, which makes me pleased with it. In the future I’ll be looking to give the presentation again to educators and librarians. If that includes any readers of this blog who may be interested, contact me if you have an event at which you’d like me to speak. And just for the record, either James or I is stalking the other. You can’t keep crossing paths this frequently without someone putting in some effort to make it so. I’m just saying.
Now a quick conference announcement: The American Fork Arts Council Conference for Writers is coming up. Here’s all the information as I received it.
American Fork Arts Council Conference for Writers
Saturday April 24 2010 9 a.m. – 4 p.m.
Historic City Hall, 31 N. Church Street (50 East), American Fork
8-9 a.m. Registration
9-9:10 Welcome (Plenary)
KEYNOTES
9:10-9:40 Keynote #1 Ginger Churchill, “What I Wish I had Known as a Beginning Writer”
9:40-10:10 Keynote #2 Ally Condie, “My Journey to National Publication”
10:10-10:40 John D. Brown, “Aiming for National Publication”
INTRODUCTIONS of editors and authors
10:40-11:05 EDITORS: Derk Koldewyn, Granite
AUTHORS: Shannon Guymon, Linda Jefferies, Caleb Warnock
11:05-11:20 15-minute break
11:20-noon BREAKOUT ONE
Upstairs room “Crafting the Novel” with Shannon Guymon, John D. Brown
Downstairs One “Finding and Working With an Agent” with Ginger Churchill, Ally Condie, Caleb Warnock
Downstairs Two “Taking Your Questions about Publishing” with Deseret Book and Granite Publishing
Noon-1 LUNCH “Mix and Mingle with Authors and Editors”
1-1:40 BREAKOUT TWO
Conference One Derk Koldewyn of Deseret Book “What Deseret Book is looking for now”
Conference Two Ginger Churchill “How to Write and Publish Picture Books”
Upstairs room John Brown, “How to Write a Story That Rocks Part 1: First Principles & Story Concept”
Office room Caleb Warnock “10 Things Every Writer Should Know about Copyright”
Downstairs One Granite Publishing “What Granite is looking for now”
Downstairs Two Ally Condie “Writing Young Adult Fiction”
1:40-1:50 Ten-minute break
1:50-2:30 BREAKOUT THREE
Upstairs Room John Brown, “How to Write a Story That Rocks Part 2: Character”
Conference Two Ginger Churchill “Genres of Children’s Books, from Board Books to YA Novels”
Conference One Derk Koldewyn of Deseret Book “National Publication with Shadow Mountain”
Office room Caleb Warnock “How to Write the Query Letter”
Downstairs One Granite Publishing “Publishing Options with Granite”
Downstairs Two Shannon Guymon “How to Write Romance”
2:30-2:40 Ten-minute break
2:40-3:20 BREAKOUT FOUR
Upstairs Room John Brown, “How to Write a Story That Rocks Part 3: Plot”
Conference Two Ginger Churchill “How to be a Writer and a Mother Too”
Conference One Linda Jefferies “Writing Poetry”
Office room Caleb Warnock “Write a Synopsis? I’d Rather Gouge My Eyes Out!”
Downstairs One Ally Condie “Succeeding as an LDS author”
Downstairs Two Shannon Guymon “Writing Nonfiction”
3:20-3:30 Ten-minute break
3:30-4:10 BREAKOUT FIVE
Upstairs Room John Brown, “Writing Scenes: The Basic Units of a Novel”
Conference Two Ginger Churchill “Querying Agents and Publishers”
Conference One Linda Jefferies “Publishing Poetry”
Office room Caleb Warnock “Okay, You Were Rejected – Why, and What to Do Now”
Downstairs One “How to form a critique group that works”
Downstairs Two Shannon Guymon “Succeeding as an LDS Author”
4:10-4:20 PRIZE GIVEAWAYS, GOODBYE
REVISED (MAY CHANGE)
Just updated my calendar, so all these events that I’m taking part in are included there if you’re interested and want a reminder.
First off, tonight I’ll be talking to Rick Walton’s BYU class on children’s publishing again. The class is about breaking into the business, and having one book out for roughly nine months I’m sure qualifies me. I really enjoyed the last time I visited the class, and expect to do so again tonight.
Next up, I’ll be taking part in a pair of events next week. The first will be a visit to East Sandy Elementary school on Thursday, March 4th. I’ll do an assembly for 3rd-6th grades at 1:30 p.m. Should be fun, as always.
The next day, Friday, March 5th, I’ll be presenting at UELMA’s Spring Conference (the Utah Educational Library Media Association), which is being held at Mountain View High School (665 West Center Street, Orem, UT). I’m slated to present at noon (as is James Dashner, who somehow always seems to follow me around. I will need to think of a particularly biting joke about him to use in my presentation to teach him a lesson). The presentation is called Goosebumps, Great Expectations? Tomato, Tomaeto, Potato, Potaeto…: Why the only poor story is a story not read. I’ve put together what should be a really fun workshop on archetypes in narrative, why they exist, and how they undergird the importance of libraries as a place where children can develop narrative literacy without the impositions on reading that come from other areas of their lives. We’ll talk about archetypal theory and see it in action in a wide variety of texts, learn who fills the Darth Vader role in Pride and Prejudice, and stuff like that. Any school librarians considering me for a visit to their school are encouraged to attend the breakout session. It will give you a good idea of what I have to offer as a teacher and presenter.
Finally, a pair of events on May 15th. In the morning I’ll be conducting a two-hour workshop on characterization and triple-duty writing (come to the workshop to see what that is) for the League of Utah Writers’ Spring Workshop. I’ll be holding the workshop from 9 – 11:00 in the morning. The event is free for League members, though I promise the experience will be worthwhile even if you have to pay. (Joining the League for $24 a year is cheaper, and well worth it for any local writer.) I’ll give more information about venue and other contributors when I learn more.
After the workshop, I’m driving to Provo to take part in the Provo Library’s Annual Provo Children’s Book Festival. I believe that I will be reading from Green Dragon Codex in the afternoon, but I’m not sure when. Of course, I’ll let you know as soon as I do. This is a great—and FREE—event, so anyone interested in children’s literature really should be there. The list of participants is just fantastic. When you start with names like Brandon Mull and Shannon Hale and don’t go down much at all from there, you know it’s going to be a quality experience. Also, those who know me are aware that I don’t do many readings, especially of my work for children. (Though I’m not too shabby at it, if you’re worried about that.) If you want to hear me read from GDC, this may be your only chance in the near future.
Finally, I try to announce other writing events in my local area when I hear about them (and when I remember to pass along the message). I’m not participating in this one this year, but the 2010 Teen Writers Conference is being held on Saturday, June 5th, at Weber State University. This is a really cool conference focused on encouraging teenage writers between the ages of 13 to 19. Josi Kilpack is kind of the driving force behind this conference, and she and other organizers have lined up a fantastic list of presenters and instructors, many of whom are good friends I respect a lot. If you’re a teen who writes or is interested in writing, or if you know such a person, please let them know about this event. It’s really a great opportunity for professional level instruction very early in a person’s development as a writer.
Posted by (6) Comment
While the conference isn’t actually over for another few hours, it is for me. Because I’m tired. And my panels are all finished, so I’ve come back home to medicate my knees and tell you all the interesting (to me, at least) bits I remember. (Things do have a tendency to blur at these things.)
Thursday
The conference started off with an interesting panel on writing style, after which I talked with Lisa Mangum about a requested manuscript of mine that’s apparently disappeared in some vortex at Shadow Mountain. She said she isn’t in the vortex neighborhood (acquisitions) any more, but that believe it or not there is bottom to the singularity and, yes, a fourteen month wait probably is a good sign in this case. Having decided I would take what I could get in the optimism department, I headed to a presentation on open source software that made me aware of a few tools that may be very, very helpful. (I’d never even heard of GIMP, which is apparently an open source graphic program in the vein of PhotoShop, for example.) After this, I attended a panel on Mormons writing, reading, and editing horror fiction, mostly because Michael Collings (formerly of Pepperdine) took part, and I always love hearing him speak and teach.
Nathan Hale (who works with Shannon Hale on the Rapunzle graphic novels but is not her husband, brother, or othersuch, but is a scion of the Hale theater dynasty) then gave the day’s keynote address, which was a blend of three presentations that wasn’t exactly seemless and was better for it. It was fun, as were the substantial number of flying fish (the helicopter rather than the standard species).
Then came my first panel of the conference: Putting Romance in Fantasy. Other panelists included Mette Harrison (who was a fine moderator in addition to contributing a great deal), Ami Chopine, Lesli Muir Lytle, and Anna del C. Dye. We talked about romance as a concept apart from romance as a genre, which I thought was important, and I even thought to bust out one of my favorite Oscar Wilde quotes. A number of people complimented me on the panel over the weekend, so I must have said something constructive, which is the goal.
Soon after I took part in my second panel of the day, which addressed why so many mothers and dogs and such die in children’s stories. My friend and former editor Stacy Whitman (who is moving to New York, hurray!) served as moderator and panelist as she pitched questions at two good friends, Julie Wright and Paul Genesse, and myself. Much of the time was spent establishing the difference between a trope and a cliche, which is a really important distinction.
Oh, I almost forgot. That night I was invited to a goodbye dinner for Stacy at Bangkok Grill in Orem (about 8th south and 3rd east, I believe). It was quite a gathering. Stacy went to BYU with Brandon Sanderson, Dan Wells, Howard Taylor, and a bunch of others now in the writing/publishing world, and they kindly let me attend with the rest of the clan. It was kind of a thing to see, about twenty-five or thirty of us, a surprising number published writers (some very famous). Here’s all you need to know: 1) Bangkok Grill is very good (Howard knows his Thai food) so you should go. Frequently. 2) Talking about methods of procuring and utilitzing tape worms for medicinal use is not the best subject for dinner conversation, but it can and does happen. 3) If you think a writer is an especially capable, interesting, or admirable kind of person, never, ever go to dinner with a gang of us. I fit in that night. That means you will be disappointed to the brink of suicide. 4) Eating spicy food at night does not hinder my sleep, for which I am profoundly grateful.
Friday
I was on the first panel of the morning, which filled up despite the hour (9:00 am) because of a really strong lineup: Guest of Honor and NY Times Bestseller Brandon Sanderson, the certified and certifiable schlock genius Howard Taylor, good buddy and perpetual puzzle James Dashner, and Larry Correia and Karen Hoover, neither of whom I knew but both certainly held their own on this heavyweight panel. I hope I did the same, because this session earned a lot of praise—perhaps because it ranged from imbibing Essence of Payton Manning (you will live a happier life if you don’t ask) to the redneck fairies in Larry’s work to Brandon’s taking “Rapunzel’s hair” and “Sponge Bob” and transmuting them into a story about a space elevator constructed of impervious, semi-divine keratin which facilitates the discovery of a race of sentient sponges. Yeah, if you weren’t there, you missed out. That fifty minutes will never be replicated.
Marty Brenneis was the day’s keynotes, and he showed how George Lucas’s special effects company did every single cool thing you’ve ever seen on film. It was a blast! (Very literally.)
At noon I was scheduled for a signing, which eventually happened though it looked for a long time that it wouldn’t. There was some miscommunication between event organizers and the BYU Bookstore, and myself along with quite a few other authors found none of our books were available to buy. When I discovered this the previous day I allowed my frustration to get the better of me for a while, but a very kind and patient woman named Tami arranged for me to sell on consignment and all went swimmingly. They even got a sign with my name printed out in three hours! I’m telling you, that girl is magic. I signed some books over the course of the hour and talked to more people, so it turned out great. A few other ladies at the bookstore helped me along with Tami though I didn’t catch their names. Thanks, ladies.
An hour later came my second panel of the day on writing authentic child characters. Other panelists were Julie Wright (a much better moderator than she gives herself credit for), Dene Low (Laura Card), Laura Bingham, Bron Bahlmann (who is sixteen and truly deserved his seat!), myself, and James Dashner doing his best Jeff Savage impression as Jeff didn’t make it. (For the record, it was more of a James doing Jeff doing a spot-on James Dashner impression.) Again, things went well. I didn’t know Dene or Laura very well, but they were both impressive. Bron made me feel both old and a touch slow, which is a striking concoction of inferiority. I’m a bit embarrassed that I laughed when James explained his process of secondary character creation, but it wasn’t insulting at all, at least, it wasn’t meant to be. It was a result of perplexity. James just writes good stories, much in the way the wind blows. He’s so instinctive where I’m analytic. He’ll tell you frankly he doesn’t know how or why about much of his process and, equally frankly, it’s like an itch I can’t scratch. I gotta know how that brain works! I swear, if he’s ever foolish enough to take a nap near me when we’re alone I’m going to find some scissors or something and poke around in his brain. James, you have been warned.
I wrapped up the day with a really interesting presentation by Bryan Beus, a visual artist who reminds me a lot of myself in his approach to art. He presented on archetypes and the monomyth in narrative from a largely visual point of view, which I found fascinating. It really was like looking at a very familiar subject through lenses just that much different from what you’re used to. We talked for a minute afterward and it was clear that there was some methodological kinship there. I’m really glad I went.
Saturday
I’m always a bit drained by the third day of a conference and I was only on one Saturday panel, so I planned on keeping things short. The day started off pleasantly when Brandon Mull and I parked near each other and walked into the Wilkinson Center together. We caught up a bit and talked shop. Brandon is one of the very successful writers who has and continues to pound the pavement like a madman. He’s visited, I don’t know, a thousand schools over the years? Whatever the actual number, he’s a legend in the local children’s writing world for his energy and work ethic. When you add that to a terrific storyteller and a genuinely nice guy, you get someone who’s always nice to cross paths with.
Again, my panel was the first of the day (though my second on romance, go figure). Where before I was the only guy on the romance panel, this was all men: moderator John Brown (who I got to know at dinner on Thursday), fellow Dragonlance writer Dan Willis, and L.E. Modesitt Jr (Lee) in addition to myself. I thought this panel was fantastic, though Lee did disagree with me a few times (ouch!). I can’t complain, honestly. This was a good panel with the four of us dealing with pretty nuanced stuff, from sociological theory to narrative craftsmanship. There was a lot of interplay and, I think, really actionable information for those in attendance. I was glad to be a part and look forward to future events with all these men (though the topic of romance seems unlike as a future place for us to meet up).
Then I spent an hour or two talking with a lovely nineteen-year-old woman about her book—or, you might say, abusing her by suggesting so many options for revision it certainly gave her a headache. I’d use her name, but she insists she’s a thirty-plus married with two children. I don’t want to expose her identity as a bald (and very young)-faced liar.
Then I went to two panels on worldbuilding.
Then I came home to write to you.
Other things I’ll report (which you may or may not want to know):
* People ask me to take pictures with them, and this happened three times at LTUE. I always agree, but still find this to be extremely odd. Rather like taking pictures of a can of soup. There is nothing particularly off putting about a can of soup, certainly, but neither is it possessed of a rare aesthetic quality. Whenever I’m asked to take a picture with someone, a single thought fills my head: stop looking so confused.
* James Dashner’s entrance in a room is sometimes accomplied by applause, only some of which is sarcastic. Brandon Sanderson’s is accompanied by greater applause, none of it sarcastic. Mine is accompanied by no applause. All of this strikes me as logical.
* Paul Genesse wrote some very generous things (perhaps overly so) on his blog after our Thursday afternoon panel. He actually posted it that day—after being on four panels! Like Brandon Mull, Paul too is a machine in synthetic flesh.
* The Brandons Mull and Sanderson signed books for my brother and his wife. I will now be even cooler to their family. (My nephew, who will be four tomorrow, thinks I’m pretty awesome already, so just wait until he can read the dedication to GDC.)
* Best panelist of the conference: L.E. Modesitt Jr. Yeah, yeah, that guy who kind of sort of disagreed with me about some stuff. I may not agree with him on everything, but I do most things—and the guy knows his craft and knows how to talk about it. I admire and respect his balance of intellectual orientation in the disciplines of economics, politics, and other social dynamics with the truly idiosyncratic nature of telling a story. He’s one who does it right, if you ask me (though he’d be the first to point out that a million other ways can be just as right). The Brandons, Howard Taylor, and Dan Wells among others are always standouts, but this weekend’s cream was Lee (which, unfortunately, rose only on Saturday as he was supporting his wife with an event she is holding this weekend). If you ever get a chance to hear Lee talk about writing, don’t pass it up, I’m telling you.
* My friend Eric Swedin and I still have yet to appear on the same panel, which is beginning to threaten mathematical probability as we know it. My five panels were, I believe, more than the allotment to anyone not a very special guest. For his part, Eric is so omni-present at this thing that it is unofficially known as Life, the Universe, and Eric. (This may become official next year depending on Eric’s generosity and the conference’s poverty.) I’m impatient to sit with him at the same covered table brimming with mics and free water, do you hear me!
* At my book signing a lady picked up my book, started to read, and in about a minute laughed long and hard out loud. That was cool.
* Yup, LTUE was all good.
Posted by (0) Comment
What do you call a bunch of librarians? A pack? A mob? I hope it’s not a murder (it is for crows, you see). Next month I’m presenting at the UELMA (Utah Educational Library Media Association) Spring Conference, where I’ll begin the session by pointing out that Charles Dickens’s Great Expectations and R.L. Stine’s Welcome to Dead House are essentially (in terms of archetype) the same story. I’ve never known any books to generate such antipathy in elementary educators as the Goosebumps books, so I’m a little worried that the session will end prematurely in some violent episode.
If it doesn’t, I’ll claim much more than a foundational sameness between Great Expectations and Welcome to Dead House; I’ll argue for the following texts being riffs on the same elemental story: Pride and Prejudice, The Harry Potter Series, The Graveyard Book, Holes, Much Ado about Nothing, Fablehaven, A Wrinkle in Time, The Tale of Despereaux, Last of the Mohicans, Dracula, Dune, Little Women, The Illiad, and the books of 1 and 2 Samuel from the Old Testament (the story of King David). And just for the record, I am NOT making a comment on the veracity or lack of such of scripture. Archetypal theory is about narrative, not fiction; it addresses the structure humans apply to everything, including facts and events, in order to construct meaning.
Sound implausible, all those books being the same story? Well, if you’re not a librarian you may have to figure out how and why this is true on your own. Then again, once I have a presentation in my toolbox I’m not one to let it rust in there. If things go well I’ll see about doing the presentation other places. Then the world can share in the wonderful knowledge that Mr. Darcy is Darth Vader, Japanese Kabuki is only technically and cosmetically different from classical Ballet, and not only do all the world’s great religions believe very similar things, but that these things are taught using the same story that undergirds life.
I’ll let you know how things go next month, as always. But next on the docket is LTUE!